Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 18°C

min temp: 11°C

Search

Blog: Volkswagen was wrong to cheat but it doesn’t suddenly make its cars bad

12:08 20 October 2015

Volkswagen may have cheated in American emissions tests but it doesn't suddlenly make its diesel engines bad.

Volkswagen may have cheated in American emissions tests but it doesn't suddlenly make its diesel engines bad.

supplied

Two letters this week dragged motoring editor Andy Russell’s family into the Volkswagen ‘Dieselgate’ emissions scandal but it hasn’t put him off the motoring giant’s cars.

The Volkswagen ‘Dieselgate’ emissions scandal really hit home this week in our household with two letters arriving the same day.

One from Volkwagen told my wife a 61-plate Golf 1.6 TDI owned by her company has an EA189 diesel engine affected while another from Audi said our son’s 63-plate A6 2.0 TDI is also at issue.

They merely confirmed my suspicions but she immediately asked the question I suspect thousands of owners caught up in the scandal and also notified this week are asking – what do we do now?

The answer is nothing. All you can do is wait for your vehicle to be called in.

The identically-worded letters confirm the vehicle remains “technically safe and roadworthy” so there is “no need for you to take any immediate action.”

Both add: “However, a service action including your car will be required to rectify the issue. Technical solutions are currently being developed and the matter is being worked upon with the utmost priority.”

So owners may no longer face uncertainty whether their vehicle is affected and know it is safe to drive but they still face a long wait. It’s not going to be a quick fix with 11 million diesel vehicles worldwide – 1.2 million in the UK – containing emissions-cheating software that allows them to know when they are being tested and temporarily cut toxic emissions.

New Volkswagen chief executive Matthias Mueller has said: “If all goes according to plan, we can start the recall in January. All the cars should be fixed by the end of 2016.”

That’s not much consolation to owners of affected cars who are planning to change them.

But all the furore about Volkswagen’s smoke – or should that be emissions – and mirrors method of testing would not put me off buying a used Volkswagen Group product, even an affected car as long as you make sure you are notified about a recall date.

Before the emissions scandal broke, these Volkswagen Group diesel engines were held in high esteem for their performance, frugal fuel efficiency and low emissions – albeit carbon dioxide (CO2) by which UK motorists pay their dues be it vehicle excise licence or benefit-in-kind tax for company car drivers. The scandal hasn’t changed that – the defeat device artificially lowered nitrogen oxide (NOx) levels.

It’s just that now, in some quarters, there is a stigma about these diesel engines because Volkswagen cheated and, on the road, the cars produced NOx pollutants at up to 40 times the legal standard. NOx can aggravate respiratory problems and existing heart disease.

Little wonder then that, in a survey by consumer group Which? of more than 2,000 Volkswagen diesel drivers, 90% felt they should receive compensation – something the car-maker has said is premature to discuss.

Some 96% cited fuel efficiency as an important factor when buying their car, 90% said environmental impact was a key consideration. The latter was also a concern in the wake of the emissions scandal by 86% of respondents, followed by resale value (83%) and performance (73%).

And 52% said they would be put off from buying a Volkswagen diesel car in the future.

Volkswagen is paying dearly to put things right, and rebuild its tarnished reputation, but it hasn’t suddenly made its products bad cars.

Do you own an affected vehicle? How do you feel about the emissions scandal? Email motoring@archant.co.uk

4 comments

  • Unfortunately for VW it is fraudulent to say the thing your selling does one thing when it quite clearly does another and of curse everyone who bought a car thinking that the stats were true has a case to get their cash back, which is why VW are considering buying all the cars back.

    Report this comment

    RV2008

    Wednesday, October 21, 2015

  • Knowingly selling an item when it has a fault, particularly one which you (the seller) has placed in it, is fraud. Normally if it was you or me or the little shop down the road doing it we would end up being charged and prosecuted for criminal fraud. I'm not fussed about my Yeti being in the recall process, but I am sadly and deeply disappointed about the company for selling them like this and then thinking they would be able to retain my support, loyalty or even custom. As an individual I can only respond in one way, bite the bullet, take a financial loss and change to a different make which I'm not very keen on

    Report this comment

    manbythesea

    Tuesday, October 20, 2015

  • are not all car manufactures upto similar tricks? v w were just unlucky in getting tumbled, my daughter drives a polo and is very pleased with it.

    Report this comment

    ted

    Monday, October 19, 2015

  • I don't understand why the cars need to be recalled. Surely the "defeat device" software was only operational under test conditions and so does not affect day to day driving? That the cars put out a huge amount of nitrous oxide more than their test results show is, now the cat is out of the bag, irrelevant. The tests were faked, everyone knows and VW will be severely punished under law. If VW were thinking they can tweak the ECU to make the pollution levels slightly better it would make me very wary if I was an owner, it might have a significant negative impact on the driveability of the cars.

    Report this comment

    Cyril the Canary

    Monday, October 19, 2015

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

A 170-tonne electricity transformer the size of a bungalow is being transported along the A12 in Suffolk on Saturday.

Chinese backers yesterday signed important financial agreements connected to the construction of Suffolk’s yet-to-be-approved Sizewell C nuclear power station.

A 15-year-old girl missing from Ipswich has been found, according to Suffolk police officers.

A 32-year-old autistic woman from Ipswich has hosted a Macmillan coffee morning in memory of her mother, who died of cancer two years ago.

And depending how significant the prize, or the emotional attachment to it, their fates can range from living out their days in a dusty draw to taking pride of place on your (or your parent’s) mantelpiece.

Police are appealing for witnesses and information after a nine-year-old girl reported being approached by two men on bicycles in Ipswich.

Police stopped a driver on the A14 this afternoon near Needham Market who was going at 107mph.

Members of a Suffolk-based fitness team have raised more than £7,000 for Ipswich Hospital’s neonatal and paediatric wards after completing the Three Peaks Challenge in just 22 hours.

Opened up in 1938, Broomhill Pool was, for decades, one of the most popular attractions in Ipswich.

A nursing home where an elderly man fell to his death has been put into special measures after inspectors gave it an overall rating of “inadequate”.

Most read

Most commented

HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Topic pages

Streetlife

Newsletter Sign Up

MyDate24 MyPhotos24