Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 20°C

min temp: 13°C

Search

Ipswich: Outrage as criminal cannot be deported because she’s a criminal

PUBLISHED: 10:41 01 November 2012

One of the illegal immigrants who was found hiding during the raids in which Ong was arrested

One of the illegal immigrants who was found hiding during the raids in which Ong was arrested

Archant

AN inability to deport a criminal because she would be shunned for her criminality in her homeland, was today branded an “outrage” by Ipswich MP Ben Gummer.

While stressing it would never be right for a politician to criticise a judge, Mr Gummer was aghast the current human rights laws have allowed Ai Vee Ong, of Hawthorn Drive, Ipswich, to successfully fight her deportation to Malaysia.

Mr Gummer lambasted them as a “corrosive influence” on the British judicial system, and said he would be taking Ong’s case up with the Home Secretary.

Ong, was jailed for four years for exploiting illegal immigrants and other offences.

The 34-year-old was employed as company secretary for Temptations Buffet Ltd in Ipswich before her arrest in August 2008.

The Upper Tribunal for the Immigration and Asylum Chamber heard Ong has a common-law husband Chee Seng Liew, who was not involved in any criminality. The pair intend to set up a Chinese takeaway business using Mr Liew’s savings following her release.

An earlier appeal for Ong to remain in the country was thrown out on the grounds the judge regarded the public interest in Ong’s deportation as substantial, although her risk of re-offending was low.

Ong appealed and Judge D E Taylor of the Upper Tribunal has now overturned the decision, allowing Ong to stay in Britain.

It was said Ong’s removal would interfere with her right to a private and family life in the UK, and deportation would not be proportionate.

The court heard Ong had not told her family about her conviction, because she would be disowned due to the shame and disgrace.

Part of Judge Taylor’s conclusion read: “Mr Liew also states that they could not build a new life together in Malaysia because they would be discriminated against because of the Appellant’s criminal record.”

“I accept the evidence that the couple would find it very difficult in reality to go back to Malaysia with the stigma of her being a criminal and the problems which he would have establishing a business there, and becoming accepted in the Chinese community there when his wife is a convicted criminal.”

Mr Gummer said: “I would like to say is in this instance is if the law is being applied in this way it is an outrage.

“It shows what a mess the immigration system has become and how tough it is going to be to get it right again. It also provides another good example of why the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights, on which Ms Ong has relied, has become such a corrosive influence on our judicial system.”

Sentencing Ong and four other defendants in April 2010 Judge Peter Thompson said, “You were all prepared to ignore the law and take any opportunity you could to make money.

“Not one of you can say you only committed a minor breach of the law.”

3 comments

  • Only in Britain: Can you imagine the French taking any notice of these legal loopholes? Send her back, as it would appear that her only "punishment" in Malaysia would be to be thought badly of. Maybe we should look at Malaysia's judicial system and treat criminals as criminals and not as victims. No wonder everyone one and his brother wants to come to Britain!

    Report this comment

    england1770

    Thursday, November 1, 2012

  • I have known ordinary, non-criminal immigrant students made to wait over a year for a Visa; one deported for having money in her bank account for 25 days instead of the required 28 days; another deported for taking £300 out of her bank account for one day and then putting it back in. Many genuine immigrants in the UK are made to fill out huge forms, pay outrageous fees, made to wait for ages, refused a visa for the tiniest error (like not ticking one box) and generally treated very badly. But then a criminal remains here only because she is a criminal. It is insane and indicates why the public perception of immigrants is so negative - they tar them all with the same brush.

    Report this comment

    Johnthebap

    Friday, November 2, 2012

  • Oh dear, what does this tell other criminals, and illegal immigrants, come to the UK they are a soft touch, but if we done something wrong, we get done, simple things like overstaying a free Sudbury carpark for a few minutes, and you are done, even though you have done no harm to anyone

    Report this comment

    Keith Drury

    Thursday, November 1, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Damage was caused to the windows and wing mirrors of several vehicles in Felixstowe over the weekend.

A decomposing whale carcass did little to deter visitors from the Suffolk seaside today- though many onlookers said its removal was already overdue.

Visitors will be able to learn more about Ipswich Hospital’s vision for the future and see some of its innovative equipment in action during an open day.

Months of major roadworks on a key route into Bury St Edmunds are set to start, as a double roundabout is removed under £2.8million plans to improve roads across the town.

An animal lover who travelled hundreds of miles from her Suffolk home to give a new life to an unwanted breeding dog has launched an appeal to help pay for veterinary care.

Hollywood film star Russell Crowe referred to singer Ed Sheeran staying at his farm with fiancée Cherry Seaborn - but will the pair marry in Suffolk?

Easton and Otley College’s ‘Big Day Out’ returned after a three year hiatus yesterday - attracting thousands to the Otley campus.

An 18-year-old Ipswich man has been arrested on suspicion of assaulting a teenage boy during a fight in the town.

No fees will be incurred by owners of beach huts if the council moves them from a stretch of eroded seafront in Felixstowe.

A Suffolk social worker has been struck off after having an inappropriate relationship with a service user while employed by Suffolk County Council.

Most read

Most commented

Show Job Lists

Topic pages

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter
MyDate24 MyPhotos24