Overcast

Overcast

max temp: 18°C

min temp: 10°C

Search

The pigs have arrived. See the latest

Pigs Gone Wild

news here.

Level crossing closures ‘could split communities’ along Suffolk’s London rail line

11:29 12 January 2015

A train heads through Mellis on the Norwich to London line

A train heads through Mellis on the Norwich to London line

Communities across Suffolk could be split with people facing miles of detours for everyday journeys if moves to close level crossings on the main rail line to London go-ahead.

Local residents of Cardinalls Road, Stowmarket, are concerned at the effect of closing the rail crossing. Pictured: Sarah Crisp and Claire PrimeLocal residents of Cardinalls Road, Stowmarket, are concerned at the effect of closing the rail crossing. Pictured: Sarah Crisp and Claire Prime

Communities across Suffolk could be split with people facing miles of detours for everyday journeys if moves to close level crossings on the main rail line to London go-ahead.

Angry campaigners claim 22 crossings are under threat – and say the rail line could become a barrier which divides the county.

As well as parts of towns and villages being cut-off from each other, businesses and amenities could suffer, and drivers face many miles extra on the road to reach their destinations.

Network Rail says some closures will be essential as part of a £476million programme to enable trains to run faster – up to 110mph – as part of the Norwich in 90 scheme for trains between Norwich and London to take just 90 minutes.

Local residents of Cardinalls Road, Stowmarket, are concerned at the effect of closing the rail crossing in the street. Pictured: 
Rosie and Mike Carter, Claire Prime, Sarah Crisp, Rachel Carter, David Crisp, Posy Brierley and Glennys FrancisLocal residents of Cardinalls Road, Stowmarket, are concerned at the effect of closing the rail crossing in the street. Pictured: Rosie and Mike Carter, Claire Prime, Sarah Crisp, Rachel Carter, David Crisp, Posy Brierley and Glennys Francis

But communities which use the crossings as part of day to day travel, for journeys to school, work, shopping, or for business, are worried about the implications – unless Network Rail stumps up the cash for bridges or tunnels.

More than 750 people have signed an online petition against the closures, and more than 5,500 have shared their concern on social media.

The Suffolk Crossings group is stepping up its campaign with a public meeting on Friday at 6.30pm at Stowmarket Community Hub, Crown Street, and has invited representatives from the Department for Transport, Network Rail, councillors and MPs.

A group spokesman said: “We expect a packed hall of outraged residents at the meeting. Support for the public campaign against the proposed level crossing closures across Suffolk has been phenomenal with over 5,500 sharing the news on social media, nearly 800 signatures on the ePetition and many messages of how these proposed closures will impact upon people’s daily lives.

“Extra journey times range from 3.2 miles in Stowmarket to 10 miles at Mellis for any round trip and many people are very worried about the extreme problems the closures will cause including damage to small businesses, getting to school and work, caring for family members, disability access, accessing health care and response times of emergency services.”

Level crossings the group claims will close are Stowmarket Station, Stowmarket Regent Street, Mellis, Haughley, Needham Market Town, Bacton, Finningham, Gislingham, Old Newton with Dagworth and Gipping, with 11 others also being considered.

The group has yet to receive a definitive list from Network Rail.

The group spokesman said: “Network Rail are claiming these closures will contribute to the Norwich in 90 scheme yet trains do not slow down for level crossings. Therefore these closures can have no impact whatsoever on train travel times.

“This meeting will call for Network Rail to consider and take full financial responsibility for the negative impact upon communities, economy, education, environment and transport that closing the crossings will inevitably create.”

Network Rail said it understood concerns some members of the public may have concerning closure of a crossing, and each crossing would be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

A spokesman said: “Before a proposal for closure is put forward, extensive consultation is undertaken with local residents, and a number of assessments, including those looking at accessability and alternate options for crossing the railway, are carried out.”

Meanwhile, for those caught the wrong side of the tracks, the simplest of tasks could in future become a tiresome journey.

It could mean some people could see their destination across the rail line, but face miles of extra driving to reach it.

Sarah Crisp, who lives in Cardinalls Road, Stowmarket, and runs Crisp Cleaning, said she would face problems personally and so would her business if the crossing, just yards from her home, was closed.

She said: “I pay my staff for my cleaning business mileage and if these crossings are closed they are going to take a lot longer and drive a lot more miles getting to places – and that’s going to come out of my pocket. We would also have to reschedule all our work.

“Personally, it will be like living in Stowmarket but not living here – we would feel more a part of Stowupland. We wouldn’t be able to just pop into Stowmarket to shop any more and would have a long drive round.

“It would make our home a lot less accessible and cause a massive drop in our house price. It will be like the rail line is cutting Suffolk down the middle.”

The multi-million pound Norwich in 90 project is based on a series of proposals from the Great Eastern Rail Campaign – and which could bring a £4.6billion benefit to the region.

The work would be done between 2019 and 2024 and aim to allow trains to run from London to Norwich in 90 minutes, Ipswich in 60 minutes and Colchester in 40 minutes.

There would be investment in new track in Essex, near Witham, and at Haughley north of Stowmarket which would make services more reliable, allowing slow-running freight trains to be moved off the main line, allowing passenger services travelling at up to 110 miles an hour to pass.

It could mean some level crossing closures, but at this stage those affected are not known. Most likely to go are some foot crossings and little-used or dangerous vehicle crossings, though some could be kept and upgraded to make them safer and allow trains to increase their speeds.

Network Rail is seeking public views on the proposals by February 3.

Online petition signer Graham Williams, of Old Newton, said: “We use the Haughley Crossing on a daily basis, not just for shops, post office and supermarket, but for access to the A14 to Bury. Closure of this crossing is stupid, and will split the two villages apart.”

Petitioner Bernard Dines, of Old Newton, said: “These closures will have a far reaching impact on all of the local communities – none of which will be positive. Without the crossings the existing infrastructure will not be able to cope with the extra traffic. The few remaining routes to effectively cross the rail line or to gain access to the A14 will become completely choked.”

If the level crossing in the centre of Mellis was to close, it will effectively split the village in two – with farms, homes, community facilities and businesses both sides of the track.

Parish councillor Tracey Simonds said: “Mellis is a village completely divided by the railway line.

“Should the crossing close both sides of the village will suffer. What about the families that walk their children to school who will now have to drive?

“What about those without a car – what will they do if they want to visit the village hall, church or friends in the village or just want to walk on the common? Those making these decisions need to visit affected areas before making such ridiculous decisions.”

More people would be forced to use cars, adding more traffic onto small country roads.

She said the crossing had always been treated with respect by villagers but felt replacing the current half barriers with full curtained barriers might make it safer and remove the risk to pedestrians walking facing the traffic and not having a barrier on their side of the road.

Alex Pullen, parish clerk to Mellis Parish Council, said the council had received no official notification of proposed closure of the level crossing in the village but expected the matter to be discussed at the council’s meeting on Thursday at 7.30pm in the Mellis Memorial Hall. At this stage it was uncertain whether the crossing concerned was the road crossing in Mellis Road, or a foot crossing.

She said: “As clerk of the council, I have received no complaints or concerns or issues regarding a closure proposal from anybody in the village.”

10 comments

  • as they have put signs up saying they are shutting the crossing, then surely the road is remaining open as British Rail runs the rail network NOT the road network and as the road was there first by several hundred years and no doubt there is history to prove this.. food for thought???

    Report this comment

    Carl Robinson

    Thursday, January 15, 2015

  • Closing the level crossings and effectively splitting Mellis in half would of course be socially and economically detrimental to our particular village. But it surely implies an incoherent transport policy at national level. Closing crossings to save travel time may benefit business in large urban centres, but only at the cost of degrading business and social cohesion in our small communities.

    Report this comment

    Peter Scott

    Wednesday, January 14, 2015

  • we have no footpaths along roads and lanes in many villages, These pedestrian crossings are a vital link for recreational walkers and link many ancient suffolk footpaths,they are vital for our acsess into the countryside.

    Report this comment

    Hilary Thorley

    Wednesday, January 14, 2015

  • I must admit when I first read about the crossings I had to look and see if it was April 1st!! How can the railways be so selfish, closing the gates would mean that a very large amount of people would have to travel lots of extra miles at great expense for what. A report in December said that by 2020 they would only get to London 5 minutes quicker, so a lot of people will suffer and only a few will gain!!!

    Report this comment

    PP

    Monday, January 12, 2015

  • Line speed is constrained to 100MPH where half barrier crossings are present hence the need to close or replace with full barrier crossings. Bridges are far better for both road and rail.

    Report this comment

    pettycm21

    Monday, January 12, 2015

  • The level crossings referred to in Bacton, Finningham and Gislingham are all pedestrian crossings, not road crossings.

    Report this comment

    Steve Blake

    Monday, January 12, 2015

  • About time we lost one of the layers of local government & let local people sort it local problems.

    Report this comment

    zaax

    Monday, January 12, 2015

  • The Stowmarket Station Crossing could be closed with much less impact if Suffolk County Council hadn't created such an abomination with their pathetic attempt at making a 'relief road'. From Tesco to the Gipping Way there are eight roundabouts to negotiate plus a narrow section of Gun Cotton Way where parked cars won't allow two-way flow. Use the old route along the A1120 and Needham Road there are two roundabouts and no parked vehicles. The worst part is the monstrosity at Gipping WayNavigation ApproachMilton Road where instead of a simple roundabout (that there was more than enough room for) we endure permanent congestion and more traffic lights than enough. The opening of Morrisons with constant queues trying to turn right from their car park opposite the Town Council offices did nothing but make things a whole lot worse. The entire town traffic system including signal phasing, illegal parking and constant traffic law infringements need a major rethink and a bit of effort from all concerned.

    Report this comment

    Keith Bailey

    Monday, January 12, 2015

  • Here we go again the EADT showing real support by getting the crossing name wrong. It is Cardinalls Road. Please if you are going to report on something, be accurate, wouldn't be a lot if good if Carninalls was put into a search engine.

    Report this comment

    ej

    Monday, January 12, 2015

  • Out of all the crossing to close, I would have thought that Carninalls Road crossing is the best one to close. It is only a few hundred yards away from the station road crossing. And it would make the road quieter for the local residents

    Report this comment

    Bungay

    Monday, January 12, 2015

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Spectators enjoying a rainy Ipswich Music Day in 2015.

Thousands of people are expected to flock to Christchurch Park this weekend for one of the most celebrated events in Ipswich’s summer calendar.

Rogue trader fined

A internet rogue trader has been told to pay nearly £51,000 for selling unsafe medical equipment and children’s scooters from his Ipswich warehouse.

Rudimental were at Thetford last night

Two years ago Rudimental were performing on the Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury when it was powered down because an electrically charged storm was exploding overhead.

Traffic lights at Wherstead Road bridge caused chaos.

Network Rail’s top manager in East Anglia has issued an unreserved apology after engineers working for his company brought Ipswich town centre to a standstill on Thursday evening.

Anyone with information is asked to call police on 101.

Help is needed to trace a man who approached a teenage girl as she walked home in Ipswich.

Pigs Gone Wild sculptures being delivered to the streets of Ipswich

This week Suffolk has seen pigs pop up around town, James May officially unveil a new motorcycle museum and ITFC begin their pre-season training. To catch up on all the latest, watch this week’s news in video.

Centennial commemoration of the start of the battle of the Somme at Long Melford War Memorial at Holy Trinity Church.

The great-nephew of a Long Melford soldier who fought at the Battle of the Somme described the “humbling” experience of blowing on the same whistle his ancestor used to send men over the top.

East of England Ambulance Service attended the crash.

Police and ambulance crews attended a two-vehicle crash this afternoon.

Faulkeners Way, in Trimley

Police want to trace a man with a blond quiff who pulled up alongside a 10-year-old boy in black panel van and spoke to him outside a play area in Trimley St Mary.

More funding is needed to help people suffering with mental ill health, Labour says

Labour has joined calls demanding more money be made available for mental health services in Suffolk, warning that reported cuts of £200,000 will have “severe consequences” for sufferers in the county.

Most read

Most commented

HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Topic pages

Streetlife

Newsletter Sign Up

Great British Life

Great British Life
MyDate24 MyPhotos24