Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 18°C

min temp: 11°C

Search

Martlesham Heath: Court of Appeal permits review into long-running Adastral Park housing row

15:01 31 July 2014

Aerial view of Adastral Park and surrounding area. Photo by Cliff Hoppitt - airshots.co.uk.

Aerial view of Adastral Park and surrounding area. Photo by Cliff Hoppitt - airshots.co.uk.

Cliff Hoppitt - airshots.co.uk

Planning chiefs in east Suffolk fear a prolonged legal row will cast further delays over “much needed” housing while hampering their ability to oppose unwanted development.

shares

The Court of Appeal has granted a review into claims that Suffolk Coastal District Council failed in its legal obligations when creating its core strategy proposals for 2,000 homes at Martlesham Heath.

A High Court Judge had in February rejected the challenge made by the campaign group No Adastral New Town Ltd, which claimed the council failed to properly assess the impact of new housing on the River Deben.

A spokesman for the group said it was “very pleased” the appeal had now been allowed and felt “vindicated” in its legal challenge.

The decision, however, will leave SCDC without a valid housing strategy until at least 2015, when the review is likely to be heard.

Geoff Holdcroft, who is responsible for planning at the council, said he was “extremely disappointed” by the news.

It will cast further delays of the council’s plans to progress the Adastral Park scheme, which accounts for more than a quarter of the district’s housing target for the next 15 years.

Mr Holdcroft also fears the lack of a core strategy will make it difficult for the council to oppose inappropriate housing applications in the district.

Developers Hopkins Homes have already referred to the lack of a five year housing plan when appealing the council’s refusal of its plans for 26 homes in Yoxford to the Planning Inspectorate.

Although that decision went in the council’s favour, Mr Holdcroft said other inspectors may decide differently for “less than ideal sites”.

“It’s going to make it very difficult for the council as developers are going to be able to take their chance with the planning system,” he said.

“I also feel really disappointed for the people in this district who badly need new housing.

“Although the local plan has a huge amount of debate and discussion, especially in relation to the potential development of homes and jobs at BT Adastral Park, it has previously been found sound by an independent planning inspector.”

The campaign group, No Adastral New Town Ltd, said it did not take the decision to pursue legal action lightly, but “the council’s intransigence left us with little choice”.

“It is disappointing that the local community were forced to go to such lengths,” the spokesman added.

shares

5 comments

  • NANT are very definitely NIMBYs of the worst kind. They are not disputing total housing numbers, only the allocation of houses to their own part of the District. They don't want 2000 houses on the Adastral site but at the Independent Inquiry into the Local Plan they made a written submission (the "Cogent" submission) suggesting that consideration should be given to reallocating some or ALL of these 2000 houses elsewhere. In practical terms, going elsewhere could only mean around Felixstowe Trimley Villages. In the meantime, people elsewhere are having to pay SCDC's legal costs to fight NANT. (Declaration of interest - STAG, of which I am a member, are opposed to large scale housebuilding around Felixstowe Trimleys on the grounds that the total numbers are excessive. We would not dream of suggesting that houses allocated here should be re-allocated anywhere else.)

    Report this comment

    Grumpy Git

    Monday, August 4, 2014

  • yes, leave things as they are - no growth or looking to the future. perhaps they ought to join forces with Save Trimley Against Growth, and then remain STAGNANT!

    Report this comment

    BlipThePeanut's Dad

    Friday, August 1, 2014

  • DebenBue's comment is not correct. Yes, there is a need for new housing, but not anywhere near Adastral Park. No, the Adastral Park does NOT guarantee any new employment. No, DebenBlue, NANT has NOT put forward any other schemes. Truth: SCDC has created this problem by its own illegal process.

    Report this comment

    AngloSaxonViking

    Thursday, July 31, 2014

  • NIMBY's. There is a desperate need for new housing including affordable housing. The scheme is good because it also includes employment, schools, etc. many of the other schemes put forward by NANT are for small developments which do not require schools or other amenities to be built and with schools already overcrowded, where will all the children that will inevitably come with these homes go? Let's home the appeal judge sees common sense and dismiss the appeal

    Report this comment

    DebenBlue

    Thursday, July 31, 2014

  • Why Mr Holdcroft "will it put more unneccessary pressures on the Council" ?, Cameron and the tories have stated that 'Local Issues and decisions affecting Local People should be taken into account' !, you are trying to 'circumnavigate' that policy !. As a matter of interest, do you live in or anywhere near the proposed area ?, because if you did you would understand peoples concerns !

    Report this comment

    freedomf

    Thursday, July 31, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Car hits wall at entrance to Christchurch Park in Fonnereau Road Ipswich

A section of the wall around Christchurch Park in Ipswich will have to be rebuilt after a car crashed into it.

View of Diesel Generator and Transformer Sets at Existing Flexible 
Generation Facility

More than 30 years after Cliff Quay power station was taken off the grid, electricity generation could return to its site – but on a very different scale.

The scene of the crash in Norwich Road.

A drug-driver who was at the wheel of a Mitsubishi towing a speedboat when it collided with an Ipswich bridal shop has been disqualified from driving.

Police at the scene of the shooting at Forum Court in Bury St Edmunds.

A man from Needham Market has been re-arrested after the Forum Court shooting.

Macmillan Cancer Support Special Directors' Award for Juliet Bellfield, chairman of the Woodbridge Macmillan Committee

Almost 30 years of outstanding leadership and loyal service to a Suffolk fundraising committee has been rewarded with a special recognition.

Eddie Brown in 2004

Tributes have been paid to a former Suffolk world darts champion who has died at the age of 78.

An Abellio Greater Anglia train at Colchester

A defective track in the Harold Wood area is affecting services from across the region.

Bury Magistrates' Court

Suffolk will be one of just six English counties with a single magistrates’ court if Ministry of Justice closure proposals go ahead.

Cliff Quay power station, Ipswich, was badly damaged by a fire in September 1982. It never generated electricity again.

Ipswich power station dominated Cliff Quay during the decades after the second world war as it provided power for the National Grid.

Ipswich Town have brought in 12 new players this summer.

The summer transfer window has now closed, during which Ipswich Town manager Mick McCarthy brought in a total of 12 new signings on permanent or loan deals.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages