Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 18°C

min temp: 11°C

Search

Martlesham Heath: Legal challenge against council’s blueprint for 2,000 homes near BT’s Adastral Park

15:35 17 January 2014

Suffolk Coastal District Council

Suffolk Coastal District Council

Archant

A district council failed to properly investigate the impact on the River Deben of 2,000 proposed new homes near BT’s Adastral Park, a High Court hearing has been told.

shares

The campaign group opposed to the plans began its legal challenge yesterday against Suffolk Coastal District Council’s blueprint for growth in the area.

No Adastral New Town (NANT) says the council failed in its legal obligations to consider the effect on the Deben estuary, when it approved the site at nearby Martlesham Heath for the extensive development.

NANT – which maintains the development will have an “irretrievable negative impact” on the area – is asking Mrs Justice Patterson 
to quash the allocation for 2,000 homes.

Any such decision would force the council to go back to the drawing board on its future housing plans for the district – set out in the Core Strategy of its Local Development Framework.

Opening the case on behalf of NANT, a leading environmental lawyer, Richard Buxton, said that it was a “rather complex story” and that the proceedings involved a huge amount of evidence.

He said: “The problem we have here stems from the fact of the proximity of the Deben Estuary not being investigated at an early stage. That is what has caused us to be in court today.

“It is about the council not 
investigating what it should have done when it should. It ignored an essential piece of background to its plan when it should have thought about its implications from day one.”

He argued that the council did not have the “good grace” to accept that it made “a number of highly regrettable errors”, which he said included the “serious error not to consider the highly protected status of the Deben Estuary when it started out in 2006”.

He alleged that this was a failure to meet the council’s obligations under the European Habitats Directive and that, in additional breach of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive, it went down the route of its preferred option without making a “sustainability appraisal”.

He continued: “Crucially, in the mean-time, it reached a final decision in July 2008 without consideration of the Devon Special Protection Area (SPA).”

That July 2008 decision, he said was “vitiated for various reasons”, including the failure to take into account the special status of the internationally recognised SPA.

He claimed that the council compounded the situation in September 2008 by increasing the allocation of houses from 1,050 to 2,000 “without any consideration of the alternatives for the extra 950 houses” and without explaining it in a lawful way to the public.

Lawyers representing the council are vigorously defending the Core Strategy at the two day hearing. The judge is likely to reserve her decision in the complex action, and to give a written ruling later this year.

The hearing continues.

shares

6 comments

  • NIMBY's! This country desperately need new housing and it has got to go somehwere, but no-one wants it near them.

    Report this comment

    N M

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • Perhaps we should know where the money is coming from to fund this case? Could it be other land owners who fear their schemes for development will fail if the most sensible development proposal for the area proceeds.

    Report this comment

    amsterdam81

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • Cmon, don't be selfish, we need an increase catchment area (northern fringe, adastral park area) to increase shoppers to Ipswich town centre!

    Report this comment

    Ipswich Entrepreneur

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • "Devon knows" ?

    Report this comment

    freedomf

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • I quote “Crucially, in the mean-time, it reached a final decision in July 2008 without consideration of the Devon Special Protection Area (SPA).” I'm guessing you mean Deben SPA ?

    Report this comment

    Sir Casm

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • How much is all this going to cost the tax payer ? Glad I do not live in the South Suffolk DC area as it must mean higher council tax bills to cover it.

    Report this comment

    The original Victor Meldrew

    Friday, January 17, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Staff and volunteers at Ipswich Library with some of the top ten books in Suffolk 
Matt Shenton, Marion Harvey, Calum Holmes and Hannah Daly

A woman with dementia in a desperate bid to find her best friend, an internal fight to fill a parish council seat and dealing with conspiracy and sabotage to take control of the family business.

Fuel fraudster in court

A fuel fraudster has been given a community order after failing to pay garages for fuel on seven occasions.

Car hits wall at entrance to Christchurch Park in Fonnereau Road Ipswich

A section of the wall around Christchurch Park in Ipswich will have to be rebuilt after a car crashed into it.

Proposed housing site in Poplar Lane , behind the Holiday Inn ,Ipswich.

Almost 500 new homes could be built on the edge of Ipswich in a move which has prompted concern among local residents.

Police at the scene of the attack on London Road South, Pakefield.

A jilted boyfriend has been found guilty of plotting to “horrifically disfigure” his ex-girlfriend, along with co-defendant Leon Thompson.

View of Diesel Generator and Transformer Sets at Existing Flexible 
Generation Facility

More than 30 years after Cliff Quay power station was taken off the grid, electricity generation could return to its site – but on a very different scale.

South East Suffolk Magistrates Court

Two former co-workers at a Trimley St Martin shop and post office have been charged with defrauding the business of nearly £9,500.

Grafitti under the A14 B1113 Newton Road bridge.

Colourful street art which has appeared on an underpass on the outskirts of a Suffolk town has sparked a debate about whether provisions should be made for it to become a feature elsewhere in the area.

The scene of the crash in Norwich Road.

A drug-driver who was at the wheel of a Mitsubishi towing a speedboat when it collided with an Ipswich bridal shop has been disqualified from driving.

Police at the scene of the shooting at Forum Court in Bury St Edmunds.

A man has been re-arrested after the Forum Court shooting.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages