Needham Market: Residents fears over proposals for crossing which was scene of rail death

Network Rail wants to close the rail crossing Gypsy Lane in Needham Market but its plans have come underfire Network Rail wants to close the rail crossing Gypsy Lane in Needham Market but its plans have come underfire

Saturday, March 22, 2014
6:00 AM

A group of residents claim they are not being listened to as proposals to build a footbridge over a busy railway line face criticism.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

About 15 people went to have their voices heard at a Needham Market Town Council meeting over concerns Network Rail has carried out an “inadequate” consultation on the proposals at the Gipsy Lane level crossing in the town.

An 82-year-old woman died when she was walking across the tracks at the crossing in August 2011.

Network Rail said it recognised the “local debate” about the footbridge but added that it would continue to work closely with the planning authority, Mid Suffolk District Council.

During the town council meeting on Wednesday night, a man referred to as Dr Flowers, said he was speaking on behalf of a number of his neighbours who live close to the “high risk” crossing.

He said: “The footbridge would be a burden to aged and infirm dog walkers. Most of them could not face going up the 36 steps and down the 36 steps.

“It would a terrible blot, not just on Gypsy Lane but on the Gipping Valley itself.

“We feel that Network Rail have failed to take the other options seriously.

“We have not been adequately consulted with.

“There was a public meeting on November 13, it was a bit of a charade; the spokesman was not there, his deputy was, but the Powerpoint presentation was not there.

“It was fairly obvious that they had made up their minds already.”

A Network Rail spokeswoman said it was “committed” to closing the crossing and providing an alternative route over the railway.

She said: “We are currently pursuing plans to construct a stepped footbridge at the crossing and divert the rights of way, currently passing over the crossing to the new bridge.

“We recognise that there has been much debate locally about the footbridge, so we continue to work closely with the local planning authority.

“Furthermore, we plan to announce the work programme later in the spring.

“Again, we would like to thank the local community for their patience and understanding on this issue.”

Suffolk County Council, which is responsible for rights of way, said it wants to see an “accessible” railway crossing and would pursue an option to build an underpass which has been considered in the past.

The county council and Network Rail are due to meet later this month to discuss the crossing.

3 comments

  • The silly solution would be a ramped footbridge at enormous expense relative to the number of users but would tick all the right boxes on an EU grant form applying for taxpayers' money. The obvious solution is to avoid walking across railways if you have significantly impaired mobility or perception. (PS what does "underfire" mean outside boiler technology?)

    Report this comment

    Roy Everett

    Saturday, March 22, 2014

  • Only 15 people turned up for the meeting out of how many living around the crossing , Network . Rail shut the crossing then put up a bridge that will shut up those who say it's unsafe ,it's was only unsafe because people did not use it right, look both ways before crossing ,listen if you hear a train don't cross ,

    Report this comment

    pandy

    Saturday, March 22, 2014

  • What other options do the locals want considered? A footbridge would appear to be the quickest and no doubt cheapest option. To excavate under the line would be costly and surely mean the closure of the main line at some stage? As Pandy says, look, listen and cross quickly. With the speed of the trains on this line, anyone with poor sight, hearing or mobility is putting themselves at risk using this crossing as it is.

    Report this comment

    The original Victor Meldrew

    Saturday, March 22, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...
iwitness24 Your news is our news Facebook Like your local paper Twitter Join the conversation Ipswich Borough Council

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT