Poll: Borough council’s metal tree project in Bury St Edmunds- costing £15,000 - is ‘a waste of money’

Two of these 3.6m tall metal trees are planned for St Andrew's Street South in Bury St Edmunds Two of these 3.6m tall metal trees are planned for St Andrew's Street South in Bury St Edmunds

Friday, April 4, 2014
11:59 AM

Two metal trees costing about £15,000 which are being installed to improve the look of a town centre street have been branded a “waste of money”.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The 3.6metre tall art installations for St Andrew’s Street South in Bury St Edmunds have been rubberstamped by St Edmundsbury Borough Council’s Bury Area Working Party.

A number of councillors have criticised the plans, and now the TaxPayers’ Alliance has described it as “ridiculous” so much is being spent on the trees without residents being consulted.

It comes as St Edmundsbury Borough Council is axing the award-winning Tourist Information Centre on Angel Hill, saving £70,000 a year, and replacing it with a network of advice points.

But a borough council spokeswoman said: “The public are not footing any part of the bill [for the trees]. The Arc developer Centros Millar made Section 106 contributions earmarked for the installation of public art for Bury St Edmunds and other Arc-related investment, which cannot be used for anything else. If they are not used, they are forfeited and the developer retains the funding.”

Independent councillor Trevor Beckwith, who has described the metal trees as a “waste of money” as well as looking “daft,” said: “But that’s still not an excuse just to spend it on anything.”

He added: “It’s all public money when said and done. We don’t have money for a dog bin or litter bin, but we have money for tin trees.”

Alan Day, 73, from Bury St Edmunds, who was passing through St Andrew’s Street South, agreed it was a “waste of money”.

He said: “You just want a nice, clear thoroughfare. That’s what you need.”

And Jonathan Isaby, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “It’s ridiculous that so much has been spent on an art installation without asking residents if it was a good use of their money.

“The council must be more transparent, especially given that the cost of the ‘trees’ is about 20 families’ council tax bill for the year.”

Councillor Robert Everitt, cabinet member for the town on the borough council and chairman of the Bury Area Working Party, said there was a “bit of a time constraint” as far as public consultation was concerned and mentioned non-council schemes around the town which had not involved public consultation.

He said “If we were to use modern art that’s not everybody’s cup of tea so trees with lights on them seemed to be a half-way house between modern art and [real] trees and that seemed to fit the bill really.”

He added: “No matter what we put there, there will always be somebody who didn’t like whatever it was that was being put there.”

The council is working with local firm Designs in Metal on the project.

The stainless steel trees will be installed in June on build-outs at the Central Walk and Market Thoroughfare crossing points.

Vox pops

Audrey Horton, 80, from Bury St Edmunds, said: “I think I could have designed a better one. I certainly prefer real trees, but I take the point about the roots because they are a nuisance.”

Will Anderson, 20, from Bury St Edmunds, said: “It’s nice and all, but it could probably be spent on other things really. What’s the good of having two metal trees? Couldn’t they have put that into schools or something?”

On the design, he added: “I don’t think it would look out of place.”

Gloria Joyce, from Bury St Edmunds and who works at the Fast-Stitch shop in St Andrew’s Street South, said the trees were “brilliant”.

“I think it’s great. It brings a little bit of character to here. I think it’s really good. We want two either side.”

Sarah Cox, 45, from Barrow, said: “It seems like quite a lot of money for a couple of metal trees which could be better spent elsewhere, but it would brighten it up round here.”

She added: “It very modern like the rest of the development. I like it better than the Saint Edmund sculpture on the roundabout [at Risbygate Street].”

4 comments

  • It's a bit rich for the Taxpayers Alliance to call for transparency and public consultation! This private lobbying organisation refuses to reveal by whom they are funded and controlled and, as a taxpayer, I don't ever recall being canvassed by them for my opinion. The organisation churns out press releases providing instant stories for lazy journalists who would serve their readers better by finding out exactly who is behind this shady group.

    Report this comment

    Tom Digby

    Friday, April 4, 2014

  • "Trees"?!? They are obviously dandelion seed heads. People ought to use their heads occasionally... And that includes councils wanting to spend insane sums on so-called art works. The money should never have been earmarked for yet another such vanity project in the first place, no matter who is paying.

    Report this comment

    blue&white

    Friday, April 4, 2014

  • What is it with these metal trees, after the xmas tree in Ipswich now 2 metal trees in BSE. What an earth is wrong with real trees. A couple of ornamental cherries would cost next to nothing and no problem with roots if you plant them correctly. Some artist with a welding torch and a bit of scrap metal must be laughing all the way to the bank. Unfortunately the joke is on the taxpayer. A total waste of money in my opinion especially so soon after the Tourist Information office harebrained decision. We really have to start questioning who is making all these decisions without any consultation.

    Report this comment

    royg

    Friday, April 4, 2014

  • So, it was paid for by the developers of The Arc, not the tax payer, and everyone wants to improve the look of the street. Not sure how this is linked in any way to the TIC changes? On that subject, like every public service, it needs to change and adapt with the times. Visitors to BSE will be getting more points of engagement andor advice with longer hours available to do this. All of the groups associated with tourism in BSE are supporting the changes. Sounds like a win-win to me

    Report this comment

    BuryBoy

    Friday, April 4, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...
iwitness24 Your news is our news Facebook Like your local paper Twitter Join the conversation Ipswich Borough Council

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT