Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 18°C

min temp: 11°C

Search

Poll: Council signs spell double trouble at resort!

13:00 21 November 2012

A sign on Felixstowe seafront with both Waveney and Suffolk Coastal District Councils

A sign on Felixstowe seafront with both Waveney and Suffolk Coastal District Councils' names - the double branding move has angered councillor Mike Sharman.

Archant

A COMMUNITY leader has today voiced strong concern over “double branding” which he believes shows two councils joining up by stealth.

shares

Town and district councillor Mike Sharman has been appalled to see the name of Waveney District Council, alongside its sister council Suffolk Coastal, on notices at Felixstowe.

He fears the district is losing its independence and the resort, whose residents often criticise management by “Big Brother” at Woodbridge, would have even less connection with an area 40 miles away.

“It is very bizarre and a little ridiculous,” said Mr Sharman.

“You don’t expect to see Waveney District Council on signs on Felixstowe seafront – they are not our council.

“I don’t think people in Ipswich would be very pleased if there were signs on the Cornhill saying Ipswich Borough Council and Babergh District Council.

“It’s as if we are losing our identity. I don’t like the way Waveney’s name takes precedence over Suffolk Coastal either – I can see the two councils being one in about 20 years, but this looks as if they are joining up by stealth.”

It is understood the notices make it more flexible for staff from the two councils to work across the borders of each authority – Waveney staff could issue fixed penalty tickets in Suffolk Coastal if the signs also state their council’s title.

This year, 176 on-the-spot fines have been issued in Waveney – 150 for littering and 26 for dog fouling and other incidents. Figures are not available for Suffolk Coastal, but there have only been a handful issued.

“The shared branding of In Partnership is used on those services which are working jointly across the two council areas of Suffolk Coastal and Waveney,” said a council spokesman.

“This is not an issue of independence but of greater efficiency, and to date these shared working initiatives have helped both councils save in excess of £4 million which is excellent news for the residents of both districts.”

■ Do you object to Waveney having its name on signs in Felixstowe? Write to Your Letters, Ipswich Star, 30 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AN, or email starletters@archant.co.uk

shares

7 comments

  • I quite agree with Mike Sharman, we are Suffolk Coastal NOT Waveney who are 40 miles away.

    Report this comment

    October girl

    Wednesday, November 21, 2012

  • Spot on RC, when people in public life think this sort of thing is important it's time they stood down because they are definitely out of touch.

    Report this comment

    skrich

    Wednesday, November 21, 2012

  • If I was a councillor, I'd be looking to share the blame as much as possible. Then again, I am not in the Waterfront Borough Council, so am obviously biased.

    Report this comment

    Winston Barrington Jr.

    Thursday, November 22, 2012

  • Does he SERIOUSLY believe anybody actually identifies with the district council that their home town or village happens to be part of? Ask anybody who lives in Felixstowe, or Grundisburgh, or Saxmundham where they live and I'll guarantee the answer won't be "Suffolk Coastal". I think it's more about a pompous politician's self-defining status.

    Report this comment

    beerlover

    Wednesday, November 21, 2012

  • Mike Sharman, you seriously need to get a life.

    Report this comment

    RC

    Wednesday, November 21, 2012

  • Rather than seeing Babergh & Ipswich, Babergh & Mid Suffolk is more likely.

    Report this comment

    John Haseltine

    Wednesday, November 21, 2012

  • Bring on the merger! We have far too many disparate local authorities in Suffolk, endlessly duplicating cost and administration - even to the ridiculous level where taxpayers money is spent on one authority commenting on another's planning decisions. Sweep away all this bureaucracy and put the money in front line services and needed activities like the Spa Pavilion.

    Report this comment

    paul

    Thursday, November 22, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Fuel fraudster in court

A fuel fraudster has been given a community order after failing to pay garages for fuel on seven occasions.

Car hits wall at entrance to Christchurch Park in Fonnereau Road Ipswich

A section of the wall around Christchurch Park in Ipswich will have to be rebuilt after a car crashed into it.

Police at the scene of the attack on London Road South, Pakefield.

A jilted boyfriend has been found guilty of plotting to “horrifically disfigure” his ex-girlfriend, along with co-defendant Leon Thompson.

View of Diesel Generator and Transformer Sets at Existing Flexible 
Generation Facility

More than 30 years after Cliff Quay power station was taken off the grid, electricity generation could return to its site – but on a very different scale.

The scene of the crash in Norwich Road.

A drug-driver who was at the wheel of a Mitsubishi towing a speedboat when it collided with an Ipswich bridal shop has been disqualified from driving.

Police at the scene of the shooting at Forum Court in Bury St Edmunds.

A man has been re-arrested after the Forum Court shooting.

Macmillan Cancer Support Special Directors' Award for Juliet Bellfield, chairman of the Woodbridge Macmillan Committee

Almost 30 years of outstanding leadership and loyal service to a Suffolk fundraising committee has been rewarded with a special recognition.

Eddie Brown in 2004

Tributes have been paid to a former Suffolk world darts champion who has died at the age of 78.

An Abellio Greater Anglia train at Colchester

A defective track in the Harold Wood area is affecting services from across the region.

Rougham Hill, Bury St Edmunds.

Concerns that Rougham Hill, in Bury St Edmunds, is becoming a “dumping ground” for developments have been raised, after suggestions the controversial West Suffolk Waste Hub could be built there.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages