THE cost of treating alcohol-related health problems for middle-aged people in Suffolk is 15 times higher than the bill for treating teens and young adults, new figures have revealed.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Habitual drinking over a number of years among those aged 55 to 74 is responsible for exacerbating more complex, long-term problems which place a greater financial burden on the NHS than one-off treatments for younger patients, experts say.

Between 2010 and 2011, the bill for the treatment of those aged 55 to 74 admitted to hospital in Suffolk for alcohol-related reasons was £10.9million – 15 times higher than the £0.7m bill for 16-to-24-year-olds, according to statistics from charity Alcohol Concern.

There were 6,920 middle-aged people admitted to the county’s two hospitals compared with only 568 young adults or teens.

Across the east of England the bill for treating the older generation was £85.3m while for 16-to-24-year-olds the figure reached £5m.

Alcohol concern

Alcohol Concern chief executive Eric Appleby said there needs to be more investment from local authorities to help those who end up in hospital.

“It is the common perception that young people are responsible for the increasing cost of alcohol misuse, but our findings show that in reality this is not the case,” he said.

“It is the middle-aged, and often middle class drinker, regularly drinking above recommended limits, who are actually requiring complex and expensive NHS care.

“There needs to be more investment in local alcohol care pathways and services by local authorities for this group, to prevent them from ending up as an in-patient.”

Simon Aalders, co-ordinator for the Suffolk Drug and Alcohol Action Team (DAAT), said treating long-term drink-related health problems suffered by middle-aged people is more expensive to the NHS than caring for a teenager or young adult who has fallen over after a night binging on alcohol.

He said the spiralling cost is the result of people getting into the habit of drinking more than the recommended amount over the course of a week.

“It is not the case that these people are binge drinking,” he said.

“Rather it is sustained drinking over a long period of time. It is people getting into a habit of having a few glasses of wine in the evenings after a long, stressful day at work.

“Then you might go out at the weekend and drink with a meal but quickly you will have exceeded the recommended number of units.

“You’re not necessarily getting drunk but over the course of the week you are drinking too much.”

He warned that such habitual behaviour was having a “significant impact” on the health of an increasing number of people.

“As you get older it takes longer to metabolise alcohol and in general it takes people longer to get over health problems,” he added.

“That is why we see the cost is higher for older people who are likely to have longer-term, more complex problems brought on by a lifetime of drinking.

“For younger people the cost is often an A&E visit after they have fallen over on a night out.

“For us the message is always consider how much you are drinking, don’t drink everyday.”

n What do you think? Write to health reporter Lizzie Parry at Ipswich Star, 30 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AN or e-mail lizzie.parry@archant.co.uk

Latest News See all

3 comments

  • ...and when you add to that figure the cost of dealing with crimes committed by drunks, the cost of policing alcohol related antisocial behaviour, vandalisation, paramedics and hospital time for the victims of street violence, investigating and then providing counselling etc for cases of domestic violence, it's obvious the smoker, who causes none of this, is being disproportionately pilloried by governments keen on being seen as supposedly worried about the nations health. They realise the majority of the voting public at large who like a drink would not put up with the exorbitant price rises and restrictive laws the minority smoker has had to endure governing their right to smoke where and when they choose. How about a ban on drinking anywhere children might be influenced....in the home perhaps?! What about reducing the opening hours of pubs and clubs selling alcohol to 1960's levels? Stop supermarkets discounting alcohol? Plain bottles? Nah - didn't think so...

    Report this comment

    Sarky Sage

    Wednesday, October 17, 2012

  • Let's not forget all these so-called "drinkers" are making a massive contribution to the economy, and they also pay a massive amount of duty that goes straight to the Treasury. Some of that can easily be diverted to the NHS, if this treacherous bunch of house-flipping expense-fiddling crooks in a jerry-rigged government that most people didn't vote for haven't managed to dismantle it before the next election! Trebles all round! Cheers!

    Report this comment

    bigger niche

    Tuesday, October 16, 2012

  • Alcohol Concern are copying the same tactics as Tobacco Control. They do not mention the amount collected in duty and tax paid by drinkers.

    Report this comment

    chas winfield

    Tuesday, October 16, 2012

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

iwitness24 Your news is our news Facebook Like your local paper Twitter Join the conversation Ipswich Borough Council

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT