Suffolk: Calls increase for police officers to improve fitness levels after being branded the worst in England

Suffolk Police and Crime Commissioner Tim Passmore Suffolk Police and Crime Commissioner Tim Passmore

Tuesday, June 17, 2014
12:46 PM

Suffolk’s police and crime commissioner last night stepped up pressure on police officers to improve their fitness levels after they were branded the worst in the country.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Tim Passmore said it was not “remotely acceptable” that Suffolk Constabulary performed the worst in the most recent national fitness tests and renewed demands on the force to overhaul results ahead of a meeting with police chiefs tomorrow.

It emerged last month how 60 officers out of 863 failed the national fitness tests, which will become mandatory in September.

In contrast, all 1,046 officers at Humberside Police passed. The national pass rate was 99%, while it was 93% in Suffolk, the worst score out of 38 police forces in England.

The tests measure endurance and are based on scientific research to match the physical demands of officer safety training.

Rank-and-file officers have complained about the fitness targets after the Tom Winsor review of police pay and conditions suggested last year that officers who fail them could lose their job.

It warned unfit police officers could put themselves, colleagues and the public in danger if they are unable to tackle criminals.

Mr Passmore said he personally found the tests not difficult. They involve completing a series of 15-metre shuttle runs at an ever increasing speed. Reaching the required level, known as 5:4, is the equivalent of running at 5.5mph for 3mins 35secs.

“I am very concerned about the situation regarding fitness at the constabulary. It is not remotely acceptable,” said Mr Passmore, who insisted he will quiz the Chief Constable at an accountability and performance panel meeting tomorrow.

“We want to become the best county and fitness is an absolutely essential component of this ambition. It needs to be put right.

“Being bottom of the fitness table is very disappointing. Among other things, it affects productivity and morale.

“We have got to step up what we do and find a solution to bring everyone up to standard as a matter of urgency.”

Nationwide, failure was previously regarded as a disciplinary offence. In Suffolk, officers are now given support, including a sports therapist and an ex-army physical training instructor, and three months to pass.

Suffolk Constabulary first introduced a similar fitness test in 2009.

However, the report being discussed tomorrow warned: “The constabulary needs to consider changing its engagement approach by removing the ‘anxiety’ messages which it believes creates a sense of fear… and replace this with a hearts and minds approach around ‘Commit to Get Fit’.”

It found more officers failed the tests in December and January, describing them as “reluctant”.

But Matt Gould, chairman of the Suffolk Police Federation, said other forces do not test all personnel like Suffolk Constabulary, rendering comparisons unfair.

He added: “Steps are being taken to alleviate fears that some officers have.”

A Suffolk Constabulary spokesman said: “We have a dedicated and professional workforce, and we want them to have a sufficient and relevant fitness level for their role.

“We have been implementing fitness testing for officers well in advance (of the mandatory tests). Our programme has therefore assessed the majority of all our officers and provides us with a comprehensive assessment of overall fitness levels.

“Our policy remains to support and monitor those that were not successful as we believe there is still some room for improvement.”

8 comments

  • As Stephen Bett was so keen to merge Norfolk and Suffolk control room staff to save money at the expense of Suffolk jobs. I wonder if Mr Passmore will take over Mr Bett's work, he stepped aside today, while London Police investigate his expenses claims? If Mr Passmore was able to cover the job thats £70,000 + saved for Betts post alone without his deputy!

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Canary Boy

    Thursday, June 19, 2014

  • you can't get fit cruising the A12 pausing only to visit the burger van.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    saxon

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

  • perhaps the doctors in suffolk are more stricter than the doctors in humberside.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    TERENCE MANNING

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

  • Less cars, more walking and cycling. Everyone's a winner.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    trevorwoolnough

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

  • This is what you get when you go over to "fire brigade policing" - officially known as "response policing"- officers finishing one job and then being tasked (driving miles) to the next one. That's why you never see a "real" police officer on foot patrol these days. I wonder what the fitness results would be for Pcso's ?

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    The original Victor Meldrew

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

  • Not sure what a non-operational officer is or why such work is not allocated to civilian staff.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    amsterdam81

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

  • Waspie's wife.....Lots more parking the cars and WALKING the old beats round the estates, like they used to ...would help fitness and give them a darn good idea of what exactly is going on in Ipswich. Especially when they have to talk to residents and get intelligence, like they used to. Kept the young troublemakers on their toes too. Now wouldn't that be a novel idea.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    waspie

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

  • Hardly a measure of fitness either , watch the test on youtube and see for yourself . Some longer legged officers are hardly even running . Was the Test taken by suffolk officers who have injuries or illness ? Why do non operational officers need to take the test ?

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Poppys Dad

    Tuesday, June 17, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...
iwitness24 Your news is our news Facebook Like your local paper Twitter Join the conversation Ipswich Borough Council

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT