SUFFOLK is monitored by a network of 761 CCTV cameras, installed and maintained at a cost of more than £4.5million.

To send a link to this page to a friend, simply enter their email address below.

The message will include the name and email address you gave us when you signed up.

 

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

A new report has highlighted the number of cameras covering the nation and the cost to each local authority since 2007.

Suffolk’s county council and seven borough and district authorities spent £4,511,374 on CCTV coverage and monitoring during that period.

Waveney District Council has spent the most, with the bill for its 40 cameras totalling £1,467,24, while Suffolk County Council has the highest number of cameras at 313 - costing £684,003.

In Essex, the county council spent £1,515,906 on its 167 cameras while Colchester Borough Council paid out £2,730,894 on its 124 cameras. Tendring spent £196,874 on installing and maintaining 114 units.

A spokeswoman for Suffolk County Council said: “We are confident that we have got the level of CCTV surveillance right in Suffolk.

“CCTV makes a positive contribution to helping to combat crime in the county and helps to ensure Suffolk residents feel safe in their communities.”

A Suffolk police spokeswoman said CCTV was an “extremely effective tool” for investigating, detecting and deterring crime.

She said: “CCTV footage can also help the police and our partners identify and address any issues that affect the quality of life in Suffolk’s neighbourhoods.”

In December a 19-year-old man was sentenced to five-and-a-half years in jail for the rape of a 51-year-old woman in Ipswich.

The spokeswoman said: “The viewing of CCTV to help secure this outcome was vital to the investigation, and the result demonstrated what a useful tool CCTV can be, assisting police to solve this and many other different types of crime.”

Last night civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, which released the figures in a report called The Price of Privacy, said Britain had an “out-of-control surveillance culture” funded with huge sums of money that would be better spent on frontline officers.

Nick Pickles, Big Brother Watch director, said CCTV was doing little to improve public safety but had made the country’s cities the most watched in the world.

He said: “Surveillance is an important tool in modern policing but it is not a substitute for policing. In too many cities across the country every corner has a camera but only a few ever see a police officer.

“Despite millions of cameras, Britain’s crime rate is not significantly lower than comparable countries that do not have such a vast surveillance state.”

Latest News See all

3 comments

  • How can each camera in Waverley cost 22000 when Tendering can do it for 1000 each. By the same measure Colchester should be able save 2.5 million !

    Report this comment

    fredjag

    Tuesday, February 21, 2012

  • Are those figures correct ? If so Waveney have some questions to answer .... why are they paying twice as much for 40 cameras than Suffolk county are for more than 300 ?

    Report this comment

    Danny Brown

    Tuesday, February 21, 2012

  • Taking a local example, why does the lobby area of Ipswich train station need SEVEN separate cameras? Once they step through the ticket barrier people will find more cameras monitoring their movement on the platforms, and yet more cameras on the trains themselves. A similar situation exists on buses. It is impossible to make a journey on public transport without having every second of your journey recorded. If you think you're safe from prying eyes in your car, think again. It is possible for the authorities to monitor your every movement on major roads through the ubiquitous VNPR cameras that have sprung up everywhere. CCTV does not deter criminals. Surveillance only really provides evidence to assist with getting a conviction after the fact and to engender paranoia in the minds of the law-abiding. We recently saw how determined criminals were able to circumvent CCTV surveillance when a jewellers was robbed under cover of a smoke screen. Unfortunately we have talked ourselves into a mindset where we think that taking these spies in the sky down will result in a massive crime wave sweeping our region. It won't. Instead, we have sleepwalked into creating a surveillance society where no one is trusted, and everyone is a potential criminal

    Report this comment

    Origami Penguin

    Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Do you want to advertise with us?
Do you want to advertise with us?

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
MyMoney24MyVouchers24

Click here to find out more about our e-editions & iPad App
Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Website Help Ipswich Borough Council Pure Weddings