Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 12°C

min temp: 9°C


Suffolk: Education chiefs fear county’s ranking in national GCSE table could fall even lower after ‘unfair’ changes to system

16:38 08 July 2014

The first GCSE results are being published

The first GCSE results are being published


Suffolk’s poor position in the national GCSE league table is in danger of falling even lower following an “unfair” shake-up of the result recording system, education chiefs have warned.

The county was ranked 137th out of 151 local authorities in England for GCSE results in 2013, when 54.6% of pupils achieved five or more A*-C grades.

It was a rise from 50.5% in 2012, but below the current national average of 61%.

But education officials have raised fears Suffolk could be the victim of a false “declining picture”, claiming the overhaul of the recording system, which compares the performance of counties, will unfairly affect the county due to it having a large number of students taking exams early.

A Suffolk County Council spokesman said: “For several years, students have been able to take their GCSE early. This means that if they get the result they expected, they can then focus on other subjects for their final exams.

“If they don’t, they can re-sit them in the summer. The student’s best grade was recorded as part of the school’s, county’s and overall national results.

“However, changes to the way results are recorded, brought in from the end of September 2013, mean that if a student takes an ‘early entry’ exam, only that grade will be recorded in official figures – regardless of whether or not the student re-takes the exam and gets a better grade at a later date.

“Because of this change, any county that has a relatively high proportion of students taking early entry exams could see their results appear to drop, even if students are actually doing better.

“As some Suffolk schools have a large number of students taking exams early, some of the county’s educational professionals have raised concerns that official figures could falsely portray a declining picture.”

Sue Cook, Suffolk County Council’s director of children’s services, insisted students will not be affected by the change, saying: “The problem comes when schools, and the local authority, are judged against other areas.

“Put simply, the best results achieved following the hard work and dedication of the students and their teachers are unlikely to be fully reflected in the league tables.

“We recognise that this is national government policy but have serious concerns about the extent to which it will impact on Suffolk.”

Graham White, secretary of the Suffolk branch of the National Union of Teachers, said the “unfair” league table may discourage some pupils from sitting early exams.

Madeleine Vigar, principal at Castle Manor Academy in Haverhill and chair of Suffolk Association of Secondary Head teachers (SASH), echoed concerns the national league table will not be an “accurate reflection” of the upcoming GCSE results.

She said: “Year 11 students in Suffolk schools have worked extremely hard this year. They have been ably supported by school leaders and teachers to achieve the very best that they can. Students’ final GCSE examination grades will indicate that they have made good and outstanding progress.

“SASH members find that the November examination results spur students on, giving them the confidence to aspire and progress further in their studies. How many people fail their driving test the first time and then go on to become excellent drivers?”

GCSE results are set to be released on August 21.


  • So in other words the headline will shortly read - Education standards continue to slip in Suffolk - at least by getting this story out first, SCC Education can try to shift the focus and blame (they're top of the league table for that!)

    Report this comment

    dale craven

    Tuesday, July 8, 2014

  • What is unfair about the new system? Doesn't everyone have the same choice to make about when to take the exams? If Suffolk has such poor results then more attention needs to be placed on better teaching rather than hoping that results will improve by taking the exam again and again.

    Report this comment


    Tuesday, July 8, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Last week’s article was about Oak Hill, the outstanding property just off Belstead Road on Oak Hill Lane, built in 1860 on a plot of land sold by Peter Burrell of Stoke Park, recaps John Norman, of the Ipswich Society.

Arthur Ransome’s tales of boats and adventure - many of which were set in Suffolk - changed the course of children’s literature.

Plans for Sizewell C are doomed to “evaporate” in the wake of insurmountable problems that will prevent its intended forerunner at Hinkley Point ever producing electricity, one of Britain’s leading environmentalists has predicted.

A Suffolk-based charity auction which has attracted bids from all over the world and raised more than £870,000 since its inception is aiming to break the £1million mark for national and local charities this year.

Fight or flight is fascinating, writes Ellen Widdup.

The A12 is now running smoothly after severe traffic delays earlier at Feering, Essex, caused by a two-car crash.

Some stores display a polite notice next to initial merchandise asking shoppers not to rearrange the items to create rude words.

Hundreds of youngsters braved the cold October temperatures to celebrate all things autumn at the Holywells Park Apple Day.

Suffolk police officers have been called to a clown sighting in Haughley, near Stowmarket this afternoon.

Detectives have said they have not given up in their quest to find the body of alleged Suffolk double murder victim Sylvia Stuart.

Most read

Most commented


Show Job Lists

Topic pages


Newsletter Sign Up

MyDate24 MyPhotos24