Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 16°C

min temp: 12°C

Search

The pigs have arrived. See the latest

Pigs Gone Wild

news here.

Suffolk: Report finds familiar failings in council’s use of spying law

11:56 28 March 2014

Report into Suffolk Coastal and Waveney

Report into Suffolk Coastal and Waveney's use of spying law

District bosses have pledged to redress failings uncovered during an inspection into its use of a surveillance tool nicknamed the ‘snooper’s charter’.

In a review of covert activities at the council, the Government’s assistant surveillance commissioner criticised “significant faults” in the authorisation of a counter-terrorism law, used by local authorities to prevent or detect crime.

His Honour David Hodson said Suffolk Coastal District Council (SCDC) had failed to take on board recommendations made in the last inspection into its use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), despite acknowledging previous similar failings.

Under the Act, covert surveillance has been used by councils for benefit fraud investigations, environmental health investigations and anti-social behaviour issues.

In a joint review of SCDC and Waveney District Council (WDC), Mr Hodson offered some praise for the clarity and comprehension of the councils’ joint policy and procedures document. He found that the 15 investigating officers had been well trained to deal with any RIPA matter to come their way, and that further refresher training was planned for early this year.

While WDC had carried out surveillance under the Act just once since its last inspection in August 2010, SCDC had used RIPA powers four times since last reviewed in January 2011.

In that time, SCDC carried out surveillance on individuals in Felixstowe, Trimley St Martin, Saxmundham and Framlingham. In each instance, no action was taken against the individual because the “illegal activity ceased”.

On all four occasions, each authorising officer failed to state why they believed proposed surveillance activity was proportionate to the perceived problem. Mr Hodson observed a tendency for each officer to repeat the same phrase when authorising the use of surveillance - a defect identified in the 2011 report but not yet resolved.

In one authorisation, written cancellation of the surveillance was not done until almost a month after the surveillance had been completed.

Under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, any interference by a public authority into an individual’s privacy must be “lawful, necessary and proportionate”.

Mr Hodson found that the single authorisation at WDC also failed to explain why the surveillance was proportionate to the perceived problem, and that the officer did not state why he believed the proposed activity was necessary.

In his recommendations, Mr Hodson said: “Further work should be done in training to ensure that authorising officers are fully aware that they must explain fully why they believe that the proposed RIPA surveillance is both necessary and proportionate. A pro forma bald assertion is not sufficient.”

In conclusion, Mr Hodson acknowledged the professionalism and enthusiasm of staff but insisted that “significant faults” in every one of the councils’ five authorisations should not have been allowed to happen. “There really cannot be any excuse for these failings to be perpetuated,” he concluded.

Since 2012, local authority use of directed surveillance under RIPA has been limited to the investigation of crimes which carry a custodial sentence of six months or more, with the exception of offences relating to the underage sale of alcohol and tobacco.

In a report to the audit and governance committee, SCDC cabinet members Doreen Savage and Robert Whiting said that the recommendations made in Mr Hodson’s review have been accepted and implemented by the council.

2 comments

  • anyone got any good comments about [ ORBIT HOUSING]?

    Report this comment

    TERENCE MANNING

    Friday, March 28, 2014

  • If the council cannot follow the rules when conducting an investigation then they probably would not be able to use any evidence they discovered. If the people involved don't understand that and the supervision is such that nobody bothers to stop it then there is the real question on why the councillors responsible for oversight don't stop their officers wasting public money in this way.

    Report this comment

    amsterdam81

    Friday, March 28, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Sylvia Stuart and her husband Peter Stuart. Photo Diss Express

A judgment on the extradition case against suspected Suffolk double murder suspect Ali Qazimaj is due to be made on Monday next week.

A14 (stock photo)

A van and a car were involved in a crash at around 6.50am today (June 29) on the westbound carriageway of the A14.

Sizewell C

The vote to leave the European Union has posed fresh doubts over the likelihood of a new nuclear power plant in Suffolk.

Video: Tornado spotted in Suffolk

Yesterday, 19:05
Tornado spotted in Old Newton. Picture: Emma Cobbold

A mid-Suffolk resident has spoken of the “surreal” moment she spotted a tornado as she drove through the county this evening (Tuesday).

Television personality Cathy McGowan came to Ipswich in February 1967

Opening in 1967, Fanny was the first boutique to open in Ipswich, writes David Kindred,

Road crash. Library image.

A crash involving a bus and a car has blocked an Ipswich road.

Michael Murdon, from Woolpit

Police are appealing for help to find a missing man from Woolpit who may be in Felixstowe.

An Abellio Greater Anglia train at Colchester

Rail services are delayed between Ipswich and Lowestoft, and between Manningtree and Colchester, due to problems on the network.

Sebastian Beaumont-Hewitt and Tobey Bloomfield.

Beaver Scouts in Ipswich celebrate 30th anniversary in swine style.

Most read

Most commented

HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Topic pages

Streetlife

Newsletter Sign Up

Great British Life

Great British Life
MyDate24 MyPhotos24