Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 14°C

min temp: 11°C


What does devolution actually mean? We see the first draft of the details

09:56 29 February 2016

Greg Clark, communities secretary

Greg Clark, communities secretary


Oyster card-style tickets and an over-arching Transport for the East responsible for funding our rail and roads are among plans being considered as part of the East Anglian devolution deal.

The details have emerged in a leaked draft for the so-called “Eastern Powerhouse”, which also demands new tax-raising and house building powers and calls for more property levies to be raised locally to be kept locally.

The small print emerged as leaders yesterday met Treasury minister Lord O’Neill in Westminster to discuss the three-county devolution deal.

The first draft – published on February 18 – comes after months of meetings and talks which has culminated in Suffolk, Cambridgshire and Norfolk councils and business leaders working together.

The eight-page dossier also raises the prospect of giving local authority leaders the powers to impose a new tourism or room levy – which is not currently legal in the UK – a demand to keep half of the stamp duty raised locally, as well as powers to fine developers with planning permission who do not start building.

It comes with a demand for an extra £1billion for the region over the next two years to deliver what they claim would be the first deal which includes both county and unitary councils.

Leaders say they were told yesterday that the Treasury was “excited” by the proposals put together by the cohort of councils, which include the district and county councils of Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire, along with the Peterborough unitary authority.

Suffolk County Council leader Colin Noble said he believed that an agreement to bring devolution to East Anglia could be signed by the end of next week following the Treasury talks.

He sad there would be intense discussions about the elements to be included during the early part of next week – and the result could be the establishment of a combined authority with responsibility for a number of functions including transport and health.

He said one of the main priorities would be working with Highways England to improve the A14 across Suffolk, but other roads like the A12 and A140 also needed attention.

There is already a route strategy being worked up for the A140 in Suffolk and there are improvements needed to the Norfolk end of the road as well, particularly a bypass for Long Stratton.

The county council has already committed resources to building a case for a four villages bypass on the A12 between Wickham Market and Saxmundham.

On health, Mr Noble said there was a need for a combined authority to take a role in co-ordinating healthcare, but he did not necessarily see it taking on responsibility for running hospitals or direct healthcare.

But if there is an agreement next week, Mr Noble said this would just be the start of the devolution process.

“Look at what has happened in Manchester. They signed their agreement months ago and they are still talking about how it will work and what services it will be responsible for.

“If we do get something signed over the next week, it will only be the start of a long journey.”

Ipswich Borough Council’s Labour leader David Ellesmere said the meeting had enabled delegates from the three counties to meet each other and officials from the Treasury – but had not got down to detailed discussions.

He said: “It was really a case to see if we could all get on together and in that we succeeded. It gave us a chance to sound each other out and establish how we could work together.

“At this stage it was not about having detailed discussions on issues. That will happen in the near future.

“The Treasury officials made it clear that we might not get all the funding that we ask for.”

He said more details of the new devolution structure and of what the Government would allow should become clear next week.

The draft proposal document asks the Government to create a 30-year multi-billion pound “Investment Fund for the East”, which it says will unlock investment and deliver economic growth.

Major new housing settlements on the Norfolk and Cambridgeshire border and in Mildenhall on the Cambridgeshire and Suffolk border are also mentioned in the deal.

What do you think? Write, giving full contact details, to Letters Editor, East Anglian Daily Times, 30 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AN

1 comment

  • Forty years ago our government undemocratically forced us into a political union. Without direct consent, without referendum, almost a millennium right of self-government was taken. Today our people endure a system where a largely unaccountable body - with virtually no representative leadership for us - implements every major aspect of governance upon us. We no longer have influence or control over political decisions affecting our lives. This distant, aloof government will never willingly change nor willingly give back any powers back to us. I therefore believe we are better off out. Yes, Ipswich should look to leave Suffolk County Council. Ipswich entered this political union in 1974 as a powerful county-borough, a major partner in a three-way stake holding with West Suffolk and East Suffolk. Suffolk’s greatest town has been disastrously diminished, from 100% control over all major county functions of local government; to long, hopeless periods when it has none at all. Devolution, based upon this already discriminatory structure, will magnify and cement the disparity and injustice for Ipswich for the next 40 years too. This must be fairly addressed ahead of any Devolution deal, with powers equitably shared with Suffolk’s County Town, its great urban and vitally important economic centre. Ipswich people, business and community leaders: YOU must make your views known and crystal clear to Cllr Noble, Ben Gummer, David Ellesmere, Mark Pendlington (LEP) et al; a Devolution for Suffolk, Norfolk & Cambridge must only happen with a balance of power and representation between the three counties; between the three rural counties and the four major urban centres of Greater Ipswich, Greater Norwich, Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough; and between those major urban centres themselves.

    Report this comment

    Mark Ling

    Monday, February 29, 2016

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

With a love for cuddles and having their tummies tickled it seems unlikely these furry friends could be evil omens or harbingers of doom.

A former angling club secretary appeared in court yesterday charged with dishonestly abusing his position to make personal financial gains of more than £10,000.

Lucky groups of youngsters are being treated to an adventure up the River Orwell and Stour estuaries - learning about the wildlife on Suffolk’s coastlines on board a sailing boat.

Suffolk Wildlife Trust today launches an ambitious £1million public appeal as part of a land purchase plan that is on a scale “unprecedented” in the nature charity’s long history.

Motorists in Suffolk are being warned to watch out for traffic delays as three abnormal loads slowly make their way along the county’s roads over the next two weeks.

One of the most popular and successful fundraising events in Suffolk has been officially launched.

The shops in Ipswich town centre are stocked up with witches outfits and trick or treat supplies, and supermarkets are doing a roaring trade in pumpkins as Halloween fast approaches.

The second Paws with a Cause dog walk took place at Glemham Hall at the weekend, raising vital funds for the East Anglian Air Ambulance (EAAA).

A third Heathrow runway has been given the go-ahead, the Government has confirmed.

Campaigners who have worked tirelessly to raise half the cash needed for a new community swimming pool have hit a funding block – and fear they may lose the money they have already accrued.

Most read

Most commented


Show Job Lists

Topic pages


Newsletter Sign Up

MyDate24 MyPhotos24