Campaigners brand proposals unfair
CAMPAIGNERS trying to stop hundreds of new homes being build on fields in the historic twin Trimley villages today branded the proposals as “unfair and unnecessary”.
CAMPAIGNERS trying to stop hundreds of new homes being build on fields in the historic twin Trimley villages today branded the proposals as “unfair and unnecessary”.
STAG - Save Trimley Against Growth - feels there is a move to deliberately “load the dice” in favour of swamping St Martin and St Mary with new homes, despite the severe impact this would have on the community.
But the action group says all the new houses needed could be built in Felixstowe - with none in the Trimleys - and the sites have been identified in the masterplan for the future of the resort.
Suffolk Coastal councillors have agreed a “going for growth” option which will mean 3,430 homes being built in Felixstowe and the Trimley villages, an increase of 26 per cent in the housing stock.
You may also want to watch:
STAG chairman Carl Storer said the option chosen was “wrong, perverse and will bring discredit to the whole of Suffolk Coastal District Council”.
He added: “The decision to favour Option Six (going for growth) ignores the facts with regard to housing statistics and land availability, grossly overstates the need for new houses, and unfairly and unnecessarily allocates greenfield land around the villages of Trimley St Mary and Trimley St Martin for large scale housing development.”
Most Read
- 1 Supermarket switch opens door to new Ipswich Lidl
- 2 Former Ipswich teacher appears in court charged with historic sex offences
- 3 Brunch trip leaves friend group 'anxious' after spiking fears
- 4 Well-known Felixstowe bookseller to retire and hand over to vinyl store
- 5 Man accused of Ipswich stabbing refuses to leave cell to enter plea
- 6 Major Ipswich road partially blocked after crash involving Audi and Mercedes
- 7 'It's like we're in the stone age' - Homophobic abuse halts LGBT+ parties
- 8 No need to wait for booster invitation - clarification after Covid jab confusion
- 9 First look inside Ipswich's new Geek Retreat games cafe
- 10 Work finally starts on the Ipswich Garden Suburb after decades of debate
STAG has now produced a 14-page report objecting to the housing proposals.
It believes the figures for the number of homes needed are fatally flawed - and planners should go back to the drawing board before it is too late.
The masterplan drawn up by David Lock Associates identifies brownfield and greenfield sites in Felixstowe capable of accommodating 1,795 new homes, which the Trimley campaigners say should be enough for the area and say the need for 3,000 homes is “grossly exaggerated”.
Other homes could then be provided in other parts of the district.
WEBLINK: www.suffolkcoastal.gov.uk
www.trimley-st.martin.org.uk
www.trimley-st-mary.org.uk
www.savetrimley.co.uk
Where do you think the new homes should be built? Write to Your Letters, Evening Star, 30 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AN, or e-mail EveningStarLetters@eveningstar.co.uk
