Sorry worth £17
IPSWICH D-Day veteran Stanley Chambers has another battle on his hands today after pension officials paid him an "insulting" £17.71 in compensation.Mr Chamber's case was highlighted by the Evening Star in March when the Pension Service had failed to reimburse him with more than £700 paid towards his wife's care.
IPSWICH D-Day veteran Stanley Chambers has another battle on his hands today after pension officials paid him an "insulting" £17.71 in compensation.
Mr Chamber's case was highlighted by the Evening Star in March when the Pension Service had failed to reimburse him with more than £700 paid towards his wife's care.
The 87-year-old also owed Broad-Acres nursing home in Knodishall more than £1,000 which he had not paid because benefits he was entitled to had not been paid.
The benefit arrears payment arrived on Mr Chamber's doorstep just days after the case was featured in the Star.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Chambers was also told his case would be considered for compensation and when an envelope arrived in the post on Friday he was filled with excitement.
But the emotion soon changed to disappointment when Mr Chambers opened the envelope to find a cheque for £17.71.
- 1 See inside beautiful stately home near Ipswich - for one day only
- 2 Labour lose seats but retain power: Ipswich election results in full
- 3 Kesgrave shooting: Trial date agreed as boy faces attempted murder charge
- 4 Van's roof torn off as it gets stuck under Suffolk bridge
- 5 First views of £1.5m new seafront cafe as hoardings removed
- 6 Did you enjoy a night out at Splitz Bar in 2002?
- 7 Joy as council reverses ban on motorhomes in car parks
- 8 Bookings now open for unique new Suffolk dining experience
- 9 Driver faces court after BMW clocked at 110mph on A14
- 10 A weekend of potential departures as Town finish up their disappointing season
Today, he is vowing to fight the Pension Service for adequate compensation claiming the dispute caused him such stress and worry that he has had to go to hospital with health problems.
He said: "This is an insult. Whatever are they thinking about? We cannot believe it. It probably cost more than that to write the thing out. Stress and strain has been caused and I think they should at least pay reasonable compensation. Look what this has caused me - why should I have to go to hospital?"
The year-long saga began when Mr Chambers wife Nancy was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in May 2003. Mr Chambers could no longer care for his wife and she was taken to the nearest available nursing home in Knodishall.
After more than 60 years of marriage the couple were forced apart with Mr Chambers left to care for their Salehurst Road home alone.
He applied for minimum income guarantee and was entitled to £102.10 a week, £84 of which would pay for the home's costs.
He did receive £47 a week of this as pension but the additional £55 minimum income guarantee did not arrive between May and October leaving him with insufficient sums to pay for his wife's care.
Mr Chambers paid the last two months fees from his own pocket believing the matter would be rectified and from October money was credited to his account.
But Mr Chambers did not receive the £1,037 owed to him until the Star stepped in in March.
Julia Crane, Mr Chamber's daughter, said: "I think he should be compensated. His health is suffering. He had to pay £700 and the stress caused especially at his age means he deserves compensation.
"The £17 special payment is just taking the mick."
Mr Chambers is now in the process of writing to MP John Gummer as the only appeals process available is through the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration who must be approached by a member of parliament.
Mrs Crane added: "He has got to make a complaint through his MP and has got to write to him so he can deal with it. I expect this is to discourage people from appealing."
A spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said she could not comment on individual cases.
She added: "Compensation is calculated with a variety of reasons depending on the individual case, including recognition of loss of use of benefit arrears. "Compensation is calculated in the form of interest in the application of the agreed percentage rate to the delayed arrears. These are attributed to the tax years in which they fall."
Do you think the compensation offered to Mr Chambers is enough? Write in to Your Letters, Evening Star, 30 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AN or e-mail email@example.com or visit the forum at www.eveningstar.co.uk