Travellers ordered to move on from Portman Road car park

PUBLISHED: 17:56 26 June 2020 | UPDATED: 17:56 26 June 2020

Travellers have been served an eviction notice after setting up camp in Portman Road, Ipswich  Picture: ARCHANT

Travellers have been served an eviction notice after setting up camp in Portman Road, Ipswich Picture: ARCHANT


A group of travellers have been served with an eviction notice to leave an Ipswich car park after ignoring the borough council’s requests to move on.

The unauthorised campers had been served with a notice under Section 77 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 to leave the Portman Road B car park by Thursday but failed to acknowledge instructions.

Ipswich Borough Council went to Suffolk Magistrates’ Court on Friday afternoon to apply for an eviction order.

The council was first notified of the presence of travellers on the site when two caravans, containing six adults and two children, appeared earlier in the month.

Authorities believe the travellers moved on to Southwold, and then Lowestoft, before returning in larger numbers at the beginning of this week.

Three caravans, a campervan and several towing vehicles remained on the site until Friday, when the encampment moved into an adjacent car park behind the AXA Insurance building.

You may also want to watch:

Amanda Garnham, cohesion officer for Norfolk and Suffolk County Council Gypsy Roma & Traveller Service, told magistrates the group had been asked about their health and welfare, and that assistance had not been required by NHS healthcare workers for any issues.

The encampment was understood to have been occupied by holidaymakers - with homes elsewhere - who could leave at any time.

Key stakeholders were consulted on whether the group should be tolerated or evicted.

Based on the fact that Ipswich’s car parks are due to become an integral part of revitalising the economy with the easing of lockdown, and that the travellers had shown no intention of moving on, the decision was made to seek eviction.

The council said the travellers were given sufficient notice of the court hearing on Friday but failed to attend and exercise their right to contest the application.

Magistrates heard there had been reports of tension, fighting, and excrement left on the site.

They were satisfied appropriate procedure had been followed and granted the application, giving the group 24 hours to leave or face the removal all vehicles and caravans from the land.

If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Ipswich Star. Click the link in the orange box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Comments have been disabled on this article.

Most Read

Latest from the Ipswich Star

An Ipswich-based law firm said it is unlikely the coronavirus stamp duty holiday will be backdated to March, despite a growing campaign. Last week chancellor Rishi Sunak announced that property buyers would pay no stamp duty on homes worth less than £500,000. According to Birketts law firm, this means someone buying a house for £341,091 – the average price of a house in East Anglia – would save £7,054. Now, a national law firm, Simpson Millar, has called on the government to backdate this tax cut to the beginning of lockdown on March 31. Sarah Ryan, head of private client and conveyancing at the firm, said: “We of course welcome the plans announced to freeze the stamp duty costs on any property up to the value of £500,000 which will not only encourage potential buyers to move on and up the proverbial ladder, but will also help to retain jobs in the real estate sector. “However, there is no denying that for some, in particular those individuals, couples and families who have managed to complete on the purchase of their home either during lockdown, or in the immediate aftermath, this will come as a bitter blow.” A petition calling for the government to backdate the holiday even further has gained nearly 10,000 signatures. If the petition reaches 10,000 signatures the government has to respond and if the petition reaches 100,000 then a debate in parliament must be held. But Karl Pocock, partner and head of tax at Birketts, does not think the government is likely to make this move. He said: “Although there are calls for Rishi Sunak to backdate the reduced stamp duty rates to the start of lockdown, the Chancellor’s goal seems to be to galvanise the housing market now. As such, much as a backdated rate cut would be very welcome news for anyone that had completed on a property purchase prior to the change in stamp duty rates, it is, in our view, unlikely. “The various residential property teams at Birketts have seen a surge in transactions as lockdown restrictions were lifted. Much of this activity was existing transactions restarting. However, we expect that the reduction in stamp duty rates will provide a further, sustained, boost to this part of the economy in the short term.”