Suffolk PCC 'surprised' at sentence reduction for Kesgrave shooter
Tim Passmore said he was 'surprised' by the decision from the Court of Appeal - Credit: Archant
Suffolk's police and crime commissioner has questioned whether reducing the sentence of a Kesgrave teenager who shot his friend in the face "sends the appropriate deterrent message".
Tim Passmore admitted he was "surprised" at the Court of Appeal decision to reduce the sentence of Jacob Talbot-Lummis by six years for attempted murder.
Talbot-Lummis was aged 15 when he drove his father's car to Friends Walk, Kesgrave, on September 7, 2020.
Armed with his grandfather's shotgun, he waited around an hour before shooting the victim, who was also aged 15 at the time, in the face from less than 5ft away.
Jacob Talbot-Lummis has had his sentence reduced - Credit: Suffolk Police
Judge Martyn Levett sentenced Talbot-Lummis to 24 years in custody with an extended five-year licence period at Ipswich Crown Court in November last year.
However, on Tuesday, three senior judges at the Court of Appeal reduced the sentence for attempted murder to one of 18 years in custody with an extended five years on licence.
At the hearing in London, Talbot-Lummis' barrister, Diana Ellis QC, argued that the sentencing judge had failed to properly consider the amount of mitigation the teenager had, including his youth, “dysfunctional” upbringing and the bullying he said he faced from his victim.
Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Julian Knowles and Mr Justice Cotter, said the trial judge was "in the best position to assess the evidence", but continued: "What, with respect, he did not address however was the full effect of the bullying, whatever its level, may have been on the appellant."
During the original sentencing hearing, Judge Levett said he did not accept “there was bullying of the scale or the degree suggested”.
Police at the scene at the time of the shooting in September 2020 - Credit: Archant
Most Read
- 1 Suffolk campsite named among the best in the UK by the Guardian
- 2 Woman injured after car flips on its roof near Ipswich
- 3 Developer criticised for 'failing to meet obligations'
- 4 Company fined £12,000 for repeatedly failing to clear Ipswich flat's waste
- 5 Friends raise money for garden for terminally ill Suffolk mum
- 6 Mother who befriended son's killer discusses his new book
- 7 Jail for man who drove stolen car at police officers
- 8 Fencing around historic Trimley station causes scare for local community
- 9 Men convicted of kidnap and rape of Ipswich girl
- 10 Forbidden Suffolk: 6 places you can't visit in the county
Reacting to the decision, Mr Passmore said: “I have no idea what additional evidence – if any, emerged at the appeal hearing to justify this decision but I must say I am surprised, particularly as the appeal judges stated the trial judge was in the best position to assess the evidence.
“This was a callous and brutal crime, made even more shocking by the age, and violent intent, of the perpetrator and I question whether this sentence reduction sends the appropriate deterrent message to other offenders.
"I can only hope that the punishment is enough to make Jacob Talbot-Lummis truly appreciate the gravity of his actions.
“Lastly, the focus quite rightly must be on the victims of crime which I believe in this case the original tariff clearly delivered.“
