Optometrist tells court she ‘did her best’ as she is cross examined in manslaughter trial over death of Vinne Barker, eight
- Credit: Sarah Lucy brown
An eye expert accused of failing to spot serious abnormalities in the eyes of an Ipswich schoolboy who later died has told a court she “had done her best” when she tested his eyes.
Giving evidence at Ipswich Crown Court, Honey Rose, who was working as a locum at Boots opticians in Upper Brook Street, Ipswich, said she had been unable to properly examine the back of eight-year-old Vinnie Barker’s eyes with an opthalmoscope because he had displayed “slight photophobia” by shutting his eyes when she shone a bright light into them at close range.
She said Vinnie, of Henley Road, Ipswich, had not had a problem with other tests she had performed using a pen torch so she did not consider he suffered from serious photophobia and had therefore not made a note of it on his records.
She said in addition to closing his eyes when she tried to examine him with the opthalmoscope, Vinnie had not looked in the direction she wanted and had what she described as “poor fixation”.
She said she that after “a couple of minutes” of trying she had abandoned examining Vinnie’s eyes with the opthalmoscope.
She accepted that if she had been able to see his optic discs she would have spotted there was a serious problem and immediately referred him to hospital.
Asked by prosecution counsel Jonathan Rees QC: “Did you actually bother to look at the back of his eye?” Rose replied: “I did my best.”
- 1 School submits plan to turn site into 7 homes
- 2 Boy, 14, injured in altercation near Ipswich primary school
- 3 Severe delays on A14 outside Ipswich after vehicle sheds turf on road
- 4 Missing Ipswich man found safe
- 5 Police hunting two men with Suffolk links after cannabis farm discovered
- 6 Emergency services attending incident in Suffolk town
- 7 Aging gas main replacement works begin around Ipswich
- 8 Victim bundled into car and hit with hammer, robbery and kidnap trial hears
- 9 Ipswich teen accused of brandishing machete tells court it was a plastic toy
- 10 'I just don't operate that way' - Town owner Steed tells it straight on first visit
Asked by Mr Rees: “Are you sure you conducted a proper examination of Vinnie?” Rose replied: “Yes I’m sure.”
She denied a suggestion she had failed to to carry out a thorough eye test because she had “made an assumption he would be fine.”
She also denied a suggestion she “hadn’t bothered” looking at retinal images of Vinnie’s eyes which would have shown there was a serious problem and claimed a colleague could have showed her someone else’s images.
Rose, 35, of London, has denied Vinnie’s manslaughter by gross negligence on July 13, 2012.
It has been alleged she failed to notice “obvious abnormalities” in both Vinnie’s eyes during a routine eye test and he died five months later from fluid on the brain.
Mr Rees QC claimed if Vinnie, of Henley Road, Ipswich, had been urgently referred his medical condition would have been identified and successfully treated.
The trial continues.